Language and Strategies at Work Studied through the Implementation of Quality Procedure Standards
In a big firm, a project for applying quality standards was followed from the drawing table to full implementation. By taking into account how language underlies this whole process, the meanings that wage-earners assign to standards can be analyzed & conflicting interpretations & disagreemen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociologie du travail (Paris) 1999-07, Vol.41 (3), p.235-254 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | fre |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In a big firm, a project for applying quality standards was followed from the drawing table to full implementation. By taking into account how language underlies this whole process, the meanings that wage-earners assign to standards can be analyzed & conflicting interpretations & disagreements about how to work observed. A detailed study is made of the relations between the specialized codified language of ISO standards & the ordinary language of the personnel, whether of project heads (who have to steer the project & mobilize wage-earners around it), of participants in the groups that have to describe work activities & draft procedures, or of the persons who, actually having to cope with changes in their jobs, pursue strategies for adopting or diverting standards. Processes of categorizing & "countercategorizing" work are thus shown to be the core issues in implementation. 22 References. Adapted from the source document. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0038-0296 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0038-0296(00)88739-7 |