Concepts of ‘Individual’ and ‘Self’ in Twentieth-Century Vietnam
‘Individual’ (cá nhân) came to the Vietnamese language in the first decades of the twentieth century, along with a host of other evocative neologisms, such as ‘society’ (xã hôi), ‘ethnic group/nation’ (dân tôc), ‘ideology’ (chu' nghĩa), ‘democracy’ (dân chu' chu' nghĩa), ‘science’ (kh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modern Asian studies 2000-10, Vol.34 (4), p.769-796 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ‘Individual’ (cá nhân) came to the
Vietnamese language in the first decades of the twentieth century, along
with a host of other evocative neologisms, such as ‘society’
(xã hôi), ‘ethnic group/nation’
(dân tôc), ‘ideology’
(chu' nghĩa), ‘democracy’ (dân
chu' chu' nghĩa), ‘science’
(khoa hoc), and ‘progress’ (tiêń
hóa). Initially, ‘individual’ was very much the poor
relation among these new concepts—merely an irreducible human unit
belonging to something else more significant. Thus, each individual was
urged to be a loyal citizen of the nation, an eager participant in some new
political organization, or a responsible member of society. Individuals were
often compared with cells in the body, each one having a legitimate role in
sustaining and enhancing the vitality of the organism, but meaningless and
incapable of surviving on their own. On the other hand, the danger also
existed of individuals acting in a selfish, short-sighted manner, which
could jeopardize the larger order of things. Such persons were said to be
witting or unwitting perpetrators of ‘individualism’
(cá nhân chu' nghĩa). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0026-749X 1469-8099 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0026749X00003851 |