Rhetorical Media Framing of Two First Lady Political Candidates Across Cultures

Kalyango and Winfield comment that their study examines the rhetoric used to frame news coverage of two first lady candidates from Uganda and the US in the final weeks of their first political campaigns for legislative office, while their spouses were still serving as president. It assesses news cov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global media journal 2009-10, Vol.8 (15), p.N_A
Hauptverfasser: Kalyango, Yusuf, Winfield, Betty H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Kalyango and Winfield comment that their study examines the rhetoric used to frame news coverage of two first lady candidates from Uganda and the US in the final weeks of their first political campaigns for legislative office, while their spouses were still serving as president. It assesses news coverage in two distinct political cultures with different forms of democracy in "The Daily Monitor" and "The New Vision of Uganda," as well as New York's "Daily News" and "The New York Times." Results show that newspapers emphasized gender-specific rhetoric to frame Janet Museveni and Hillary Clinton during their campaigns. The US newspapers covered Clinton's campaign speeches and platform on international peace initiatives and national security, yet the Ugandan press did not highlight Museveni's statements on the northern war and peace initiatives. Kalyango and Winfield argue that these newspapers underscored their first lady familial dudies, and framed them as emotionally weak and unfit to serve beyond political spousal roles.
ISSN:1550-7521
1550-7521