Sanctions as coercive diplomacy: the U.S. president's decision to initiate economic sanctions

While economic sanctions are widely believed to be ineffective policy instruments, their use has increased in recent years. Scholars have analyzed the question of sanction effectiveness, but few have approached the conditions that lead to their employment. This article addresses that question: what...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political research quarterly 2001-09, Vol.54 (3), p.485-508
1. Verfasser: Drury, A Cooper
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While economic sanctions are widely believed to be ineffective policy instruments, their use has increased in recent years. Scholars have analyzed the question of sanction effectiveness, but few have approached the conditions that lead to their employment. This article addresses that question: what conditions lead a country to initiate economic sanctions? Focusing on the US, both the relations with the target country & the domestic political & economic conditions in America are considered as factors leading to the imposition of economic sanctions. Time-series -- cross-section data from 50 countries between 1962-1992 show that the president considers both the relations with the target & American domestic factors when deciding to initiate economic sanctions. However, the relationship with the target is the largest stimulus to sanction use, while the domestic factors only marginally influence the decision. The analysis highlights the importance of economic sanctions as a form of coercive diplomacy aimed at the target & not a White House reaction to domestic demands for action. 2 Tables, 62 References. Adapted from the source document.
ISSN:1065-9129
DOI:10.1177/106591290105400301