Sanctions as coercive diplomacy: the U.S. president's decision to initiate economic sanctions
While economic sanctions are widely believed to be ineffective policy instruments, their use has increased in recent years. Scholars have analyzed the question of sanction effectiveness, but few have approached the conditions that lead to their employment. This article addresses that question: what...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political research quarterly 2001-09, Vol.54 (3), p.485-508 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | While economic sanctions are widely believed to be ineffective policy instruments, their use has increased in recent years. Scholars have analyzed the question of sanction effectiveness, but few have approached the conditions that lead to their employment. This article addresses that question: what conditions lead a country to initiate economic sanctions? Focusing on the US, both the relations with the target country & the domestic political & economic conditions in America are considered as factors leading to the imposition of economic sanctions. Time-series -- cross-section data from 50 countries between 1962-1992 show that the president considers both the relations with the target & American domestic factors when deciding to initiate economic sanctions. However, the relationship with the target is the largest stimulus to sanction use, while the domestic factors only marginally influence the decision. The analysis highlights the importance of economic sanctions as a form of coercive diplomacy aimed at the target & not a White House reaction to domestic demands for action. 2 Tables, 62 References. Adapted from the source document. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1065-9129 |
DOI: | 10.1177/106591290105400301 |