A comparison of regression and ARIMA models for assessing program effects: An application to the mandated highway speed limit reduction of 1974
Time series analysis is a technique that has been utilized by econometricians & others for examining the relationship between events & time, particularly for forecasting purposes. More recent work has focused on time series analysis as a method of evaluating the effects of an exogenous event...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social indicators research 1983-01, Vol.12 (1), p.83-105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Time series analysis is a technique that has been utilized by econometricians & others for examining the relationship between events & time, particularly for forecasting purposes. More recent work has focused on time series analysis as a method of evaluating the effects of an exogenous event on a series. The major disadvantage of the interrupted time series design over a simple pre-post comparison is that the form of the change is taken into account. Two alternative models for analyzing such data are examined here: regression & ARIMA (Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Averages). An example of their application is demonstrated using data on highway deaths in NC occurring before & after the national reduction in speed limits instituted in 1974. Conclusions are drawn about the comparative usefulness of these two techniques for program evaluation. 3 Figures, 12 References. HA. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0303-8300 1573-0921 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF00428862 |