Directionality of Development and the Ryoko Model: Reply to Four Commentaries
Questions about time are fundamentally connected to development. In addition to the Generative Life Cycle Model (GLCM), this article explores a new way of looking at the concept of life-span development. In particular, it examines principal ideas expressed in the Ryoko (Parallel Going) Model, which...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Culture & psychology 2006-06, Vol.12 (2), p.260-272 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Questions about time are fundamentally connected to development. In addition to the
Generative Life Cycle Model (GLCM), this article explores a new way of looking at
the concept of life-span development. In particular, it examines principal ideas
expressed in the Ryoko (Parallel Going) Model, which casts doubts on the
Western system of meaning and master narrative of progressivism. For example,
Baltes’ multi-dimensional model of life-span development indicates that
gain always implies growth and loss implies decline. In contrast, the Ryoko
Model is able to handle simultaneous dual changes in opposite and reverse
tendencies: a change toward gain implies a change toward loss, and vice versa. This
approach allows us to become aware of how opposite meanings can coexist within
different perspectives and contexts and to reintroduce the values of
‘loss’ and ‘death’ as positive aspects of
human development and the generative cycle of time. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1354-067X 1461-7056 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1354067X06064595 |