The Case of Markets versus Standards for Pollution Policy
Market-based incentives (MBI) for pollution control (pollution taxes, subsidies for abatement, and marketable emissions permits) have gained attention and increased in use in recent years, due to their potential for achieving the same emissions goals as traditional "command and control" (C...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Natural resources journal 2005-04, Vol.45 (2), p.345-368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Market-based incentives (MBI) for pollution control (pollution taxes, subsidies for abatement, and marketable emissions permits) have gained attention and increased in use in recent years, due to their potential for achieving the same emissions goals as traditional "command and control" (CAC) (also known as standards) approaches at lower cost. This article reviews the evidence of the superiority of MBI relative to CAC. While MBI will achieve a specified emissions level at lower cost, their ability to achieve the same environmental effectiveness is not always certain, and the "commodification" of the environment associated with MBI raises ethical concerns among some. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-0739 2640-2149 |