So Who's Afraid of Frankenstein Food?

An examination of the debate surrounding genetically engineered food argues that both sides ignore morally relevant aspects of the issue such as the duty to respect the autonomy of individuals. It is proposed that the debate be guided by genetic engineering utilitarianism which maintains that an action is morally right if any reasonable person would believe that action would have as much or more utility as any alternative. Using this standard, the genetic engineering of food should not be allowed. It is contended that fairness demands that the debate includes the application of both utilitarian & Kantian theories. Although the genetic engineering of plants/animals does not inherently violate anyones autonomy under Kantianism, it has the potential for violating the autonomy of every individual in relation to a persons life choices. It is concluded that genetically altered foodstuffs are unacceptable using either utilitarian or Kantian principles. Therefore, the production of such foods should be stopped, especially in a capitalistic system where business profits are valued more highly than the public good. References. J. Lindroth