The Law: Executive Power and Prosecution: Lessons from the Libby Trial and the U.S. Attorney Firings
The tensions between law and politics in the federal administration of justice are long-standing and rooted in the expectation that the Department of Justice acts as both a presidential policy agency and an impartial prosecutor of federal crime. The investigation and trial of I. Lewis Libby by a spe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Presidential studies quarterly 2008-09, Vol.38 (3), p.491-505 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The tensions between law and politics in the federal administration of justice are long-standing and rooted in the expectation that the Department of Justice acts as both a presidential policy agency and an impartial prosecutor of federal crime. The investigation and trial of I. Lewis Libby by a special counsel (2003-7) and the scandal over the firing of U.S. attorneys by the George W. Bush administration (2006-7) demonstrate the challenges faced in trying to strike a balance between democratic accountability and the impartial administration of justice. Congressional and public confidence in the impartiality of the attorney general is the most important factor in managing these ever-present tensions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-4918 1741-5705 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02657.x |