The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers
As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is consid...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International organizations law review 2006-01, Vol.3 (1), p.93-135 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 135 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | International organizations law review |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Raab, Dominic Bevers, Hans |
description | As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is considered. Second, the separation of powers is considered as constitutional law, at the domestic & international levels. Third, the application of the separation of powers to the ICC is reviewed, with particular consideration given to the decision-making procedures relating to prosecutorial discretion, sentencing & victims' compensation. Each particular ICC decision-making procedure is compared, for the purpose of providing domestic comparisons from the common law & civil law systems, with the analogous procedure under the law of England & Wales & the Netherlands. Fourth, the ICC is considered as a system of checks & balances & a number of conclusions are drawn. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/157237406777880332 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59843899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59843899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-bba78eb5c353a08e24a952f6e4889550d5effa4cb4704e9b67bd1160d47798b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gysQWc2I7tgQEqWgoVILXMlp1cREoaF9sV8O9xG9QFiemeTt-703sInWf4MssKcpUxnhNOccE5FwITkh-gwXaZxi0_3Gsij9GJ90uMiSRYDND14g2SaRfAdTo0ttNtMnLNqtkJu3Eh0V2VhAjNYa3djklsnbzYT3D-FB3VuvVw9juH6HV8txjdp7PnyXR0M0sNzVhIjdFcgGElYURjATnVkuV1AVQIyRiuGNS1pqWhHFOQpuCmirFwRTmXwhAyRBf93bWzHxvwQa0aX0Lb6g7sxismBSVCygjmPVg6672DWq1jGu2-VYbVtin1t6loSntT4wN87R3avauCE87Uw-NCifkMZ_Rpom4jj3veuKZt1TLWFOvy_734AWjgd2M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>59843899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Raab, Dominic ; Bevers, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Raab, Dominic ; Bevers, Hans</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is considered. Second, the separation of powers is considered as constitutional law, at the domestic & international levels. Third, the application of the separation of powers to the ICC is reviewed, with particular consideration given to the decision-making procedures relating to prosecutorial discretion, sentencing & victims' compensation. Each particular ICC decision-making procedure is compared, for the purpose of providing domestic comparisons from the common law & civil law systems, with the analogous procedure under the law of England & Wales & the Netherlands. Fourth, the ICC is considered as a system of checks & balances & a number of conclusions are drawn. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-3739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-3747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-3739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157237406777880332</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff</publisher><subject>Checks and Balances ; Constitutional Law ; International Court ; International Law ; Separation of Powers</subject><ispartof>International organizations law review, 2006-01, Vol.3 (1), p.93-135</ispartof><rights>2006 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-bba78eb5c353a08e24a952f6e4889550d5effa4cb4704e9b67bd1160d47798b33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raab, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevers, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers</title><title>International organizations law review</title><addtitle>IOLR</addtitle><description><![CDATA[As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is considered. Second, the separation of powers is considered as constitutional law, at the domestic & international levels. Third, the application of the separation of powers to the ICC is reviewed, with particular consideration given to the decision-making procedures relating to prosecutorial discretion, sentencing & victims' compensation. Each particular ICC decision-making procedure is compared, for the purpose of providing domestic comparisons from the common law & civil law systems, with the analogous procedure under the law of England & Wales & the Netherlands. Fourth, the ICC is considered as a system of checks & balances & a number of conclusions are drawn. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><subject>Checks and Balances</subject><subject>Constitutional Law</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International Law</subject><subject>Separation of Powers</subject><issn>1572-3739</issn><issn>1572-3747</issn><issn>1572-3739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gysQWc2I7tgQEqWgoVILXMlp1cREoaF9sV8O9xG9QFiemeTt-703sInWf4MssKcpUxnhNOccE5FwITkh-gwXaZxi0_3Gsij9GJ90uMiSRYDND14g2SaRfAdTo0ttNtMnLNqtkJu3Eh0V2VhAjNYa3djklsnbzYT3D-FB3VuvVw9juH6HV8txjdp7PnyXR0M0sNzVhIjdFcgGElYURjATnVkuV1AVQIyRiuGNS1pqWhHFOQpuCmirFwRTmXwhAyRBf93bWzHxvwQa0aX0Lb6g7sxismBSVCygjmPVg6672DWq1jGu2-VYbVtin1t6loSntT4wN87R3avauCE87Uw-NCifkMZ_Rpom4jj3veuKZt1TLWFOvy_734AWjgd2M</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Raab, Dominic</creator><creator>Bevers, Hans</creator><general>Martinus Nijhoff</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers</title><author>Raab, Dominic ; Bevers, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-bba78eb5c353a08e24a952f6e4889550d5effa4cb4704e9b67bd1160d47798b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Checks and Balances</topic><topic>Constitutional Law</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International Law</topic><topic>Separation of Powers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raab, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevers, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International organizations law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raab, Dominic</au><au>Bevers, Hans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers</atitle><jtitle>International organizations law review</jtitle><addtitle>IOLR</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>93-135</pages><issn>1572-3739</issn><eissn>1572-3747</eissn><eissn>1572-3739</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is considered. Second, the separation of powers is considered as constitutional law, at the domestic & international levels. Third, the application of the separation of powers to the ICC is reviewed, with particular consideration given to the decision-making procedures relating to prosecutorial discretion, sentencing & victims' compensation. Each particular ICC decision-making procedure is compared, for the purpose of providing domestic comparisons from the common law & civil law systems, with the analogous procedure under the law of England & Wales & the Netherlands. Fourth, the ICC is considered as a system of checks & balances & a number of conclusions are drawn. Adapted from the source document.]]></abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>Martinus Nijhoff</pub><doi>10.1163/157237406777880332</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1572-3739 |
ispartof | International organizations law review, 2006-01, Vol.3 (1), p.93-135 |
issn | 1572-3739 1572-3747 1572-3739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59843899 |
source | Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Checks and Balances Constitutional Law International Court International Law Separation of Powers |
title | The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T15%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20International%20Criminal%20Court%20and%20the%20Separation%20of%20Powers&rft.jtitle=International%20organizations%20law%20review&rft.au=Raab,%20Dominic&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=93-135&rft.issn=1572-3739&rft.eissn=1572-3747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157237406777880332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E59843899%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=59843899&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |