The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers

As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is consid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International organizations law review 2006-01, Vol.3 (1), p.93-135
Hauptverfasser: Raab, Dominic, Bevers, Hans
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 1
container_start_page 93
container_title International organizations law review
container_volume 3
creator Raab, Dominic
Bevers, Hans
description As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is considered. Second, the separation of powers is considered as constitutional law, at the domestic & international levels. Third, the application of the separation of powers to the ICC is reviewed, with particular consideration given to the decision-making procedures relating to prosecutorial discretion, sentencing & victims' compensation. Each particular ICC decision-making procedure is compared, for the purpose of providing domestic comparisons from the common law & civil law systems, with the analogous procedure under the law of England & Wales & the Netherlands. Fourth, the ICC is considered as a system of checks & balances & a number of conclusions are drawn. Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/157237406777880332
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59843899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59843899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-bba78eb5c353a08e24a952f6e4889550d5effa4cb4704e9b67bd1160d47798b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gysQWc2I7tgQEqWgoVILXMlp1cREoaF9sV8O9xG9QFiemeTt-703sInWf4MssKcpUxnhNOccE5FwITkh-gwXaZxi0_3Gsij9GJ90uMiSRYDND14g2SaRfAdTo0ttNtMnLNqtkJu3Eh0V2VhAjNYa3djklsnbzYT3D-FB3VuvVw9juH6HV8txjdp7PnyXR0M0sNzVhIjdFcgGElYURjATnVkuV1AVQIyRiuGNS1pqWhHFOQpuCmirFwRTmXwhAyRBf93bWzHxvwQa0aX0Lb6g7sxismBSVCygjmPVg6672DWq1jGu2-VYbVtin1t6loSntT4wN87R3avauCE87Uw-NCifkMZ_Rpom4jj3veuKZt1TLWFOvy_734AWjgd2M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>59843899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Raab, Dominic ; Bevers, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Raab, Dominic ; Bevers, Hans</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is considered. Second, the separation of powers is considered as constitutional law, at the domestic & international levels. Third, the application of the separation of powers to the ICC is reviewed, with particular consideration given to the decision-making procedures relating to prosecutorial discretion, sentencing & victims' compensation. Each particular ICC decision-making procedure is compared, for the purpose of providing domestic comparisons from the common law & civil law systems, with the analogous procedure under the law of England & Wales & the Netherlands. Fourth, the ICC is considered as a system of checks & balances & a number of conclusions are drawn. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-3739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-3747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-3739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157237406777880332</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff</publisher><subject>Checks and Balances ; Constitutional Law ; International Court ; International Law ; Separation of Powers</subject><ispartof>International organizations law review, 2006-01, Vol.3 (1), p.93-135</ispartof><rights>2006 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-bba78eb5c353a08e24a952f6e4889550d5effa4cb4704e9b67bd1160d47798b33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raab, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevers, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers</title><title>International organizations law review</title><addtitle>IOLR</addtitle><description><![CDATA[As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is considered. Second, the separation of powers is considered as constitutional law, at the domestic & international levels. Third, the application of the separation of powers to the ICC is reviewed, with particular consideration given to the decision-making procedures relating to prosecutorial discretion, sentencing & victims' compensation. Each particular ICC decision-making procedure is compared, for the purpose of providing domestic comparisons from the common law & civil law systems, with the analogous procedure under the law of England & Wales & the Netherlands. Fourth, the ICC is considered as a system of checks & balances & a number of conclusions are drawn. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><subject>Checks and Balances</subject><subject>Constitutional Law</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International Law</subject><subject>Separation of Powers</subject><issn>1572-3739</issn><issn>1572-3747</issn><issn>1572-3739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gysQWc2I7tgQEqWgoVILXMlp1cREoaF9sV8O9xG9QFiemeTt-703sInWf4MssKcpUxnhNOccE5FwITkh-gwXaZxi0_3Gsij9GJ90uMiSRYDND14g2SaRfAdTo0ttNtMnLNqtkJu3Eh0V2VhAjNYa3djklsnbzYT3D-FB3VuvVw9juH6HV8txjdp7PnyXR0M0sNzVhIjdFcgGElYURjATnVkuV1AVQIyRiuGNS1pqWhHFOQpuCmirFwRTmXwhAyRBf93bWzHxvwQa0aX0Lb6g7sxismBSVCygjmPVg6672DWq1jGu2-VYbVtin1t6loSntT4wN87R3avauCE87Uw-NCifkMZ_Rpom4jj3veuKZt1TLWFOvy_734AWjgd2M</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Raab, Dominic</creator><creator>Bevers, Hans</creator><general>Martinus Nijhoff</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers</title><author>Raab, Dominic ; Bevers, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-bba78eb5c353a08e24a952f6e4889550d5effa4cb4704e9b67bd1160d47798b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Checks and Balances</topic><topic>Constitutional Law</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International Law</topic><topic>Separation of Powers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raab, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevers, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International organizations law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raab, Dominic</au><au>Bevers, Hans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers</atitle><jtitle>International organizations law review</jtitle><addtitle>IOLR</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>93-135</pages><issn>1572-3739</issn><eissn>1572-3747</eissn><eissn>1572-3739</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[As the International Criminal Court (ICC) develops its institutional capacity in readiness to hear its first cases, this article considers the application of the doctrine of the separation of powers to the Court. First, the historical development of the doctrine of the separation of powers is considered. Second, the separation of powers is considered as constitutional law, at the domestic & international levels. Third, the application of the separation of powers to the ICC is reviewed, with particular consideration given to the decision-making procedures relating to prosecutorial discretion, sentencing & victims' compensation. Each particular ICC decision-making procedure is compared, for the purpose of providing domestic comparisons from the common law & civil law systems, with the analogous procedure under the law of England & Wales & the Netherlands. Fourth, the ICC is considered as a system of checks & balances & a number of conclusions are drawn. Adapted from the source document.]]></abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>Martinus Nijhoff</pub><doi>10.1163/157237406777880332</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1572-3739
ispartof International organizations law review, 2006-01, Vol.3 (1), p.93-135
issn 1572-3739
1572-3747
1572-3739
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59843899
source Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Checks and Balances
Constitutional Law
International Court
International Law
Separation of Powers
title The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T15%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20International%20Criminal%20Court%20and%20the%20Separation%20of%20Powers&rft.jtitle=International%20organizations%20law%20review&rft.au=Raab,%20Dominic&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=93-135&rft.issn=1572-3739&rft.eissn=1572-3747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157237406777880332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E59843899%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=59843899&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true