Defining Political Science: A Cross-National Survey
It has been nearly two decades since Gabriel Almond observed that political scientists tend to sit at ‘separate tables’. Surprisingly, there has been no attempt to ask extensively among the members of the profession what they actually believe about its essential meaning, purpose, and trajectory. Thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European political science 2008-06, Vol.7 (2), p.207-219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It has been nearly two decades since Gabriel Almond observed that political scientists tend to sit at ‘separate tables’. Surprisingly, there has been no attempt to ask extensively among the members of the profession what they actually believe about its essential meaning, purpose, and trajectory. This paper is based on a questionnaire sent to faculty in more than 500 political science departments worldwide. Respondents were asked to define
political science
, to list three works that best represent
political science
as they understand it, and to give their views regarding what
political science
will be over the next twenty years. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1680-4333 1682-0983 |
DOI: | 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210171 |