Savings and Loan Industry: Strategic Responses to Regulatory Change
Partial deregulation of the financial services industry has created an acute earnings squeeze for many savings and loan associations (S&L). Regulation Q of the Banking Act of 1933 enabled S&Ls to provide low-cost funds for residential mortgage lending. Most of the problems facing S&Ls to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Business & society 1984-04, Vol.23 (1), p.37-44 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Partial deregulation of the financial services industry has created an acute earnings squeeze for many savings and loan associations (S&L). Regulation Q of the Banking Act of 1933 enabled S&Ls to provide low-cost funds for residential mortgage lending. Most of the problems facing S&Ls today are a result of rapid changes in Regulation Q. The Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act in 1980 called for phasing out Regulation Q and eliminating the interest rate differentials paid by thrifts. However, the phaseout of Regulation Q went much more quickly than mandated, leaving S&Ls unable to develop strategic responses. Deregulation of S&L's assets did not keep pace with deregulation of their liabilities. Governments may need to develop more balanced deregulation that gives industries time to respond. S&Ls have developed short-term strategies to regain market share, but the success of these strategies depends on a number of uncontrollable variables, including interest rates and legislation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-6503 1552-4205 |
DOI: | 10.1177/000765038402300106 |