Savings and Loan Industry: Strategic Responses to Regulatory Change

Partial deregulation of the financial services industry has created an acute earnings squeeze for many savings and loan associations (S&L). Regulation Q of the Banking Act of 1933 enabled S&Ls to provide low-cost funds for residential mortgage lending. Most of the problems facing S&Ls to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business & society 1984-04, Vol.23 (1), p.37-44
Hauptverfasser: Hopkins, Willie E., Hopkins, Shirley A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Partial deregulation of the financial services industry has created an acute earnings squeeze for many savings and loan associations (S&L). Regulation Q of the Banking Act of 1933 enabled S&Ls to provide low-cost funds for residential mortgage lending. Most of the problems facing S&Ls today are a result of rapid changes in Regulation Q. The Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act in 1980 called for phasing out Regulation Q and eliminating the interest rate differentials paid by thrifts. However, the phaseout of Regulation Q went much more quickly than mandated, leaving S&Ls unable to develop strategic responses. Deregulation of S&L's assets did not keep pace with deregulation of their liabilities. Governments may need to develop more balanced deregulation that gives industries time to respond. S&Ls have developed short-term strategies to regain market share, but the success of these strategies depends on a number of uncontrollable variables, including interest rates and legislation.
ISSN:0007-6503
1552-4205
DOI:10.1177/000765038402300106