Compulsory Arbitration: An Experiment in Pennsylvania
Justice delayed is justice denied, and nearly every state in the Union is faced with the problem of an increasing burden of litigation that is clogging court calendars and making it virtually impossible to bring suits to trial without months of delay. Mr. Swartz writes of an experiment in Pennsylvan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American Bar Association Journal 1956-06, Vol.42 (6), p.513-516 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Justice delayed is justice denied, and nearly every state in the Union is faced with the problem of an increasing burden of litigation that is clogging court calendars and making it virtually impossible to bring suits to trial without months of delay. Mr. Swartz writes of an experiment in Pennsylvania which has proved highly successful. Small claims are referred to a board of lawyer-arbitrators for hearing and decision, with a right of appeal and a trial de novo before a court. The complete details of the plan are discussed below. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-7596 0747-0088 2162-7975 2162-7983 |