Merging Wisely

In the midst of the worldwide financial crisis, funders are increasingly suggesting that nonprofits consider merging - that is, fusing their boards, management, andlegal entities to form a single organization. Now 2010 is upon us, and the urge to merge shows no signs of abating. Underlying this tren...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stanford social innovation review 2010-04, Vol.8 (2), p.28-33
1. Verfasser: La Piana, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the midst of the worldwide financial crisis, funders are increasingly suggesting that nonprofits consider merging - that is, fusing their boards, management, andlegal entities to form a single organization. Now 2010 is upon us, and the urge to merge shows no signs of abating. Underlying this trend are two core beliefs: The nonprofit sector has too many organizations, and most nonprofits are too small and are therefore inefficient. Mergers, the thinking goes, would reduce the intense competition for scarce funding. Consolidating organizations would also introduce economies of scale to the sector, increasing efficiency and improving effectiveness. Yet a closer look at the nonprofit sector suggests that this thinking is too simplistic. Mergers are risky business. They sometimes fail, although not so frequently as in the corporate world. They usually cost more than anticipated. They sometimes create more problems than they solve. And the problems that they allegedly solve - too many nonprofits, too small in size - may not be problems after all. Instead of reflexively pulling out the biggest gun in the partnership arsenal, nonprofits should consider a variety of ways of working together.
ISSN:1542-7099