Implementing International Human Rights Law in Post Conflict Settings - Backlash without Buy-In: Lessons from Afghanistan
Abstract This paper explores the difficulties of implementing international human rights standards in post conflict states, particularly in Islamic States, using Afghanistan as a case study. The paper will submit that imposing international human rights law with a top down' approach is ineffec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 2009-04, Vol.5 (1), p.5 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
This paper explores the difficulties of implementing international human rights standards in post conflict states, particularly in Islamic States, using Afghanistan as a case study. The paper will submit that imposing international human rights law with a top down' approach is ineffective, using the example of the western-style Afghan constitution which contains many human rights protections, such as freedom of religion, that cannot be realized in contemporary Afghan society. It will be argued that a more transparent, consultative and long-term approach to human rights implementation should be taken in post conflict situations, if human rights' is to be more than a catch phrase for membership of the international community.
Recommended Citation
Smith, Leanne M.
(2008)
"Implementing International Human Rights Law in Post Conflict Settings - Backlash without Buy-In: Lessons from Afghanistan,"
Muslim World Journal of Human Rights:
Vol. 5
:
Iss.
1, Article 5.
DOI: 10.2202/1554-4419.1146
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/mwjhr/vol5/iss1/art5 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1554-4419 1554-4419 |
DOI: | 10.2202/1554-4419.1146 |