Intentionality and Belief de re: A Critical Study of Searle's Representative Internalism
John Rogers Searle's rejection of the notion of beliefs de re (1983) is criticized with respect to two central contentions: (1) The notion of conditions of satisfaction used by Searle to reclassify traditional beliefs de re under beliefs de dicto is ambiguous between world conditions & ment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Erkenntnis 1994-07, Vol.41 (1), p.65-85 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | John Rogers Searle's rejection of the notion of beliefs de re (1983) is criticized with respect to two central contentions: (1) The notion of conditions of satisfaction used by Searle to reclassify traditional beliefs de re under beliefs de dicto is ambiguous between world conditions & mental state conditions. (2) Searle's denial of representation commitments is refuted on grounds of implication by properties of representations. The ambiguity of (1) & Searle's failure to consider transference of commitments under (2) are argued to render Searle's account incoherent. 13 References. J. Hitchcock |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-0106 1572-8420 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF01128911 |