Parallel Structure: A Source of Facilitation in Sentence Comprehension

Reading time for the second clause of a conjoined sentence was found to be faster when the clause was structurally similar to the first clause than when the clausal structures differed (N = 72). This "parallel structure" effect was found for each of several types of structures, including a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Memory & cognition 1984-01, Vol.12 (5), p.421-430
Hauptverfasser: Frazier, Lyn, Taft, Lori, Roeper, Tom, Clifton, Charles, Ehrlich, Kate
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reading time for the second clause of a conjoined sentence was found to be faster when the clause was structurally similar to the first clause than when the clausal structures differed (N = 72). This "parallel structure" effect was found for each of several types of structures, including active vs passive constructions, direct O vs sentential complement (minimal vs nonminimal attachment), nonshifted vs shifted heavy NP, agent vs theme, & animate vs inanimate NP. The pervasiveness of the effect ruled out some hypotheses about its basis, including the hypothesis that it would occur only when a S's just having processed a structure would affect how temporary ambiguities are resolved. Detailed analysis of the data suggest the existence of several distinct sources of the effect & provide indirect evidence that people typically compute both a surface & an S-structure representation of a sentence. 2 Tables, 15 References. HA
ISSN:0090-502X
DOI:10.3758/BF03198303