The Selection of Distractors for Eyewitness Lineups

Thefts were staged for 252 eyewitnesses using seven different confederate thieves. Photospreads were constructed for each eyewitness to test a proposal regarding strategies for selecting lineup distractors ( C. A. E. Luus & G. L. Wells, 1991 ). Distractors were selected to resemble a suspect or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied psychology 1993-10, Vol.78 (5), p.835-844
Hauptverfasser: Wells, Gary L, Rydell, Sheila M, Seelau, Eric P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Thefts were staged for 252 eyewitnesses using seven different confederate thieves. Photospreads were constructed for each eyewitness to test a proposal regarding strategies for selecting lineup distractors ( C. A. E. Luus & G. L. Wells, 1991 ). Distractors were selected to resemble a suspect or to match the eyewitness's description of the culprit. A mismatch-description strategy was included for comparison and contrast with the other two strategies. The match-description strategy produced both a low false-identification rate and a high accurate-identification rate. The mismatch-description strategy was unable to hold down false-identification rates, and the resemble-suspect strategy failed to secure acceptable rates of accurate identification. The match-description strategy captures the best features of the mismatch-description and resemble-suspect strategies without also capturing their worst features.
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.835