Debate on expanding social citizenship: critiques and reply regarding Schmitter, P. C. and Bauer, M. W. 'A (modest) proposal for expanding social citizenship in the European Union', Journal of European Social Policy 11 (1): 55-65
Van Parijs and Vanderborght respond to Schmitter and Bauer's article, arguing that the way in which transnational solidarity is organized within the European Union must be fundamentally re-thought, but that the proposed Euro-Stipendium is not the best way forward. Matsaganis also criticizes the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of European social policy 2001-11, Vol.11 (4), p.342-352 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Van Parijs and Vanderborght respond to Schmitter and Bauer's article, arguing that the way in which transnational solidarity is organized within the European Union must be fundamentally re-thought, but that the proposed Euro-Stipendium is not the best way forward. Matsaganis also criticizes the Euro-Stipendium and calls for an EU social transfer that avoids the perils of means-testing and moral hazard. Bauer and Schmitter reply, accepting some of the suggestions offered but rejecting other criticisms. (Quotes from original text) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0958-9287 |