Fifth and Sixth Amendments--The right to counsel in multiple charge arraignments

Fifth and Sixth Amendments--The right to counsel in multiple charge arraignments

In McNeil V. Wisconsin the Supreme Court held that a suspect's invocation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel at an arraignment on one charge does not imply invocation of the Fifth Amendment right to counsel at an interrogation concerning a separate crime. Argues that the majority's de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of criminal law & criminology 1992-01, Vol.82 (Winter 92), p.904-919
1. Verfasser: Ullman, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Constitutional aspects
Counsel
Defendants
Rights
USA
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In McNeil V. Wisconsin the Supreme Court held that a suspect's invocation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel at an arraignment on one charge does not imply invocation of the Fifth Amendment right to counsel at an interrogation concerning a separate crime. Argues that the majority's decision was correct. (PAS)
ISSN:0091-4169