Predictive Validity of Cocaine, Sedative, and Alcohol Dependence Diagnoses

This study examined the predictive validity of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R ( Spitzer, Williams, Gibbon, & First, 1990 ) based substance dependence diagnoses (i.e., cocaine, sedative, and alcohol) for 518 opioid-dependent outpatients entering methadone maintenance. Patients were f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 1998-02, Vol.66 (1), p.168-173
Hauptverfasser: Kidorf, Michael, Brooner, Robert K, King, Van L, Stoller, Kenneth B, Wertz, Jennifer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study examined the predictive validity of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R ( Spitzer, Williams, Gibbon, & First, 1990 ) based substance dependence diagnoses (i.e., cocaine, sedative, and alcohol) for 518 opioid-dependent outpatients entering methadone maintenance. Patients were followed over 1 year of treatment, which involved daily methadone substitution supplemented by individual and group counseling. Urine specimens were tested randomly 1-4 times per month. Patients diagnosed with current cocaine, sedative, or alcohol dependence were more likely to use these drugs than were patients with past only or no dependence syndrome. Current cocaine dependence predicted early treatment dropout. The results demonstrate the predictive and discriminant validity of several substance dependence diagnoses common among patients in substance abuse or other psychiatric treatment settings.
ISSN:0022-006X
1939-2117
DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.168