Clinical study of the relation of borderline personality disorder to Briquet's syndrome (hysteria), somatization disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and substance abuse disorders [published erratum appears in Am J Psychiatry 1997 Jan;154(1):139]
OBJECTIVE: The criteria for borderline personality disorder seem to select patients with very high rates of Briquet's syndrome (hysteria), somatization disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and substance abuse disorders. This study was undertaken to determine whether systematic assessment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of psychiatry 1996-12, Vol.153 (12), p.1598-1606 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE: The criteria for borderline personality disorder seem to
select patients with very high rates of Briquet's syndrome (hysteria),
somatization disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and substance abuse
disorders. This study was undertaken to determine whether systematic
assessment of patients with borderline personality disorder would reveal
characteristic features of that condition which would distinguish it from
these other disorders. METHOD: Eighty-seven white female patients (75 in
St. Louis and 12 in Milan, Italy) who had borderline personality disorder
according to both the DSM-III-R criteria and the Revised Diagnostic
Interview for Borderlines were further examined with the DSM-III-R
Checklist and the Perley-Guze Hysteria Checklist to determine their
patterns of psychiatric comorbidity. RESULTS: Every patient had at least
one additional DSM diagnosis. Patients in St. Louis and Milan averaged five
and four additional diagnoses, respectively. Eighty-four percent of the
patients in St. Louis met criteria for either somatization disorder,
Briquet's syndrome, antisocial personality disorder, or substance abuse
disorders. Patterns of comorbidity for panic (51%), generalized anxiety
disorder (55%), and major depression (87%) in St. Louis were consistent
with those in other studies. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the
boundaries for the borderline condition are not specific and identify a
high percentage of patients with these other disorders. Furthermore, the
comorbidity profiles closely resemble the psychiatric profiles of patients
with these disorders. If the borderline syndrome is meant to include all of
these disorders, its usefulness as a diagnosis is limited. Until the
fundamental features of borderline personality disorder that distinguish it
from the others are identified, it is recommended that clinicians carefully
assess patients for these other diagnoses. Efforts should be made to change
the borderline personality disorder criteria by shifting away from overlap
with the criteria for the other disorders. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-953X 1535-7228 |
DOI: | 10.1176/ajp.153.12.1598 |