Best-first fixed-depth minimax algorithms

This article has three main contributions to our understanding of minimax search: First, a new formulation for Stockman's SSS ∗ algorithm, based on Alpha-Beta, is presented. It solves all the perceived drawbacks of SSS ∗, finally transforming it into a practical algorithm. In effect, we show th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Artificial intelligence 1996-11, Vol.87 (1), p.255-293
Hauptverfasser: Plaat, Aske, Schaeffer, Jonathan, Pijls, Wim, de Bruin, Arie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article has three main contributions to our understanding of minimax search: First, a new formulation for Stockman's SSS ∗ algorithm, based on Alpha-Beta, is presented. It solves all the perceived drawbacks of SSS ∗, finally transforming it into a practical algorithm. In effect, we show that SSS ∗ = Alpha-Beta + transposition tables. The crucial step is the realization that transposition tables contain so-called solution trees, structures that are used in best-first search algorithms like SSS ∗. Having created a practical version, we present performance measurements with tournament game-playing programs for three different minimax games, yielding results that contradict a number of publications. Second, based on the insights gained in our attempts at understanding SSS ∗, we present a framework that facilitates the construction of several best-first fixed-depth game-tree search algorithms, known and new. The framework is based on depth-first null-window Alpha-Beta search, enhanced with storage to allow for the refining of previous search results. It focuses attention on the essential differences between algorithms. Third, a new instance of this framework is presented. It performs better than algorithms that are currently used in most state-of-the-art game-playing programs. We provide experimental evidence to explain why this new algorithm, MTD( f), performs better than other fixed-depth minimax algorithms.
ISSN:0004-3702
1872-7921
DOI:10.1016/0004-3702(95)00126-3