Are Implicit Motives "Visible" to Well-Acquainted Others?

In this study, we compared self-ratings and informant ratings of personality as predictors of implicit motives, need for achievement (nAch), and need for affiliation (nAff). A total of 120 participants wrote creative stories to 5 images from the Picture Story Exercise ( Smith, 1992 ) and completed t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality assessment 2009-07, Vol.91 (4), p.373-380
Hauptverfasser: Daugherty, James R., Kurtz, John E., Phebus, John B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study, we compared self-ratings and informant ratings of personality as predictors of implicit motives, need for achievement (nAch), and need for affiliation (nAff). A total of 120 participants wrote creative stories to 5 images from the Picture Story Exercise ( Smith, 1992 ) and completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory ( Costa & McCrae, 1992 ). Three well-acquainted informants rated each participant's personality with the Big Five Inventory ( John & Srivastava, 1999 ) and Saucier's (1994) Mini-Markers. Consistent with the study hypotheses, peer ratings of Conscientiousness significantly predicted nAch scores after controlling for word count and self-rated Conscientiousness. Contrary to hypotheses, peer ratings and self-ratings in all 5 domains did not significantly predict nAff scores. The findings are considered in the interest of bridging the gap between trait and motive concepts in personality assessment.
ISSN:0022-3891
1532-7752
DOI:10.1080/00223890902936207