Are Implicit Motives "Visible" to Well-Acquainted Others?
In this study, we compared self-ratings and informant ratings of personality as predictors of implicit motives, need for achievement (nAch), and need for affiliation (nAff). A total of 120 participants wrote creative stories to 5 images from the Picture Story Exercise ( Smith, 1992 ) and completed t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality assessment 2009-07, Vol.91 (4), p.373-380 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this study, we compared self-ratings and informant ratings of personality as predictors of implicit motives, need for achievement (nAch), and need for affiliation (nAff). A total of 120 participants wrote creative stories to 5 images from the Picture Story Exercise (
Smith, 1992
) and completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (
Costa & McCrae, 1992
). Three well-acquainted informants rated each participant's personality with the Big Five Inventory (
John & Srivastava, 1999
) and
Saucier's (1994)
Mini-Markers. Consistent with the study hypotheses, peer ratings of Conscientiousness significantly predicted nAch scores after controlling for word count and self-rated Conscientiousness. Contrary to hypotheses, peer ratings and self-ratings in all 5 domains did not significantly predict nAff scores. The findings are considered in the interest of bridging the gap between trait and motive concepts in personality assessment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3891 1532-7752 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00223890902936207 |