Medical Education: Impact of two types of Internet-based information on medical students' performance in an Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE)

Objectives Internet-based information has potential to impact physician-patient relationships. This study examined medical students' interpretation and response to such information presented during an objective clinical examination. Method Ninety-three medical students who had received training...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Patient education and counseling 2009-07, Vol.76 (1), p.5-9
Hauptverfasser: Elder, William G, Dassow, Paul L, Bruckner, Geza G, Stratton, Terry D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Internet-based information has potential to impact physician-patient relationships. This study examined medical students' interpretation and response to such information presented during an objective clinical examination. Method Ninety-three medical students who had received training for a patient centered response to inquiries about alternative treatments completed a comprehensive examination in their third year. In 1 of 12 objective structured clinical exams, a SP presented Internet-based information on l-theanine - an amino acid available as a supplement. In Condition A, materials were from commercial websites; in Condition B, materials were from the PubMed website. Results Analyses revealed no significant differences between Conditions in student performance or patient (SP) satisfaction. Students in Condition A rated the information less compelling than students in Condition B (z = -1.78, p = .037), and attributed less of the treatment's action to real vs. placebo effects (z = -1.61, p = .053). Conclusions Students trained in a patient centered response to inquiries about alternative treatment perceived the credibility of the two types of Internet-based information differently but were able to respond to the patient without jeopardizing patient satisfaction. Approach to information was superficial. Training in information evaluation may be warranted. [Copyright Elsevier B.V.]
ISSN:0738-3991
DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.014