Lost Opportunities and Constraints in Producing Rigorous Evaluations of USAID Health Projects, 2004-7
Impact evaluation is often seen as a central building block of results-based management. But in USAID rigorous impact evaluations have been crowded out by the drive to outcome-monitoring in the name of the results agenda. Other constraints on adopting quantitatively well-designed impact evaluation d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IDS bulletin (Brighton. 1984) 2008-03, Vol.39 (1), p.90-97 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Impact evaluation is often seen as a central building block of results-based management. But in USAID rigorous impact evaluations have been crowded out by the drive to outcome-monitoring in the name of the results agenda. Other constraints on adopting quantitatively well-designed impact evaluation designs have included a lack of the required technical skills amongst those charged with conducting evaluations, the lack of incentives to produce quality studies - including the desire to avoid uncovering weak performance - and hence a lack of political will to expand the impact evaluation programme. The article proposes a new evaluation agenda to address these deficiencies. Adapted from the source document. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0265-5012 1759-5436 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2008.tb00435.x |