Do clinical pathways really improve clinical performance in mental health settings?

Objective:  Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (RBWH) Mental Health developed and trialled two clinical pathways on psychosis and depression between 2001 and 2003 with the aim of improving a range of clinical and financial parameters. There was a strong commitment from senior management, appropriat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2006-12, Vol.14 (4), p.395-398
Hauptverfasser: Emmerson, Brett, Frost, Aaron, Fawcett, Lisa, Ballantyne, Emma, Ward, Warren, Catts, Stan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective:  Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (RBWH) Mental Health developed and trialled two clinical pathways on psychosis and depression between 2001 and 2003 with the aim of improving a range of clinical and financial parameters. There was a strong commitment from senior management, appropriate resources were allocated and there was adequate staff support. Following a 6‐month trial, the pathways were reworked extensively and combined into an acute inpatient pathway. From October 2003 to 2004, we trialled the acute inpatient clinical pathway, and monitored clinical and financial parameters. Conclusion:  Over this 12‐month period, the acute inpatient clinical pathway failed to demonstrate improvement on a range of clinical and financial parameters and its use was ceased. This trial lends support to the view that the complexity, individuality and variability of mental disorders means that clinical pathways are not beneficial in mental health settings.
ISSN:1039-8562
1440-1665
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1665.2006.02311.x