Appearance–reality distinction and development of gender constancy understanding in children
In two independent studies, the relationship between children’s ability to distinguish appearance from reality (AR) and their understanding of gender constancy1 (GC) was examined. In Study 1, German children (N = 130) aged 3;8 to 9;5 years were tested (1) in four standard AR tasks, and (2) by 21 ite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of behavioral development 2003-05, Vol.27 (3), p.275-283 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In two independent studies, the relationship between children’s ability to
distinguish appearance from reality (AR) and their understanding of gender
constancy1 (GC) was examined. In Study 1, German children (N =
130) aged 3;8 to 9;5 years were tested (1) in four standard AR tasks, and (2) by 21
items related to the three stages of gender constancy understanding. In Study 2,
Hungarian children (N = 75) aged 3;0 to 6;0 years responded to (1)
appearance and reality questions while they or an experimenter were wearing a facial
mask, and (2) a gender constancy interview using Bem’s(1989) photographs
and scripts. In Study 2, the role of genital knowledge was also examined. For gender
consistency questions, children were asked about appearance (“looks
like”) and reality (“really is”) in both
studies. Applying pass–fail criteria to AR and GC responses, children in
both studies were grouped as “realists” vs.
“nonrealists” and as
“gender-constant” vs.
“non-gender-constant”. The two studies converged in
finding a strong association between the ability to distinguish appearance from
reality and gender constancy understanding. The observed association between AR and
GC was independent of age and children’s genital knowledge. However, while
the results of Study 1 suggested that the AR distinction precedes sex-category
constancy, in Study 2 the two abilities appeared to develop concurrently. Further,
children in Study 1 achieved both AR and GC at a later age than children in Study 2. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-0254 1464-0651 |
DOI: | 10.1080/01650250244000362 |