The effects of Type A behavior and stress on the attribution of causality
In this study, we tested predictions derived from Glass’ model (1977) which argued that Type A behavior is a coping response to the threat of control loss. Based on attribution theory (Kelley 1967), which suggests that people engage in attribution processes to obtain or maintain a sense of control,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality and individual differences 2005, Vol.38 (2), p.403-412 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this study, we tested predictions derived from Glass’ model (1977) which argued that Type A behavior is a coping response to the threat of control loss. Based on attribution theory (Kelley 1967), which suggests that people engage in attribution processes to obtain or maintain a sense of control, we hypothesized that Type As would form more causal attributions than Type Bs, and that this difference between the two types would be greater under high-stress than under low-stress conditions. Sixty-eight high-tech employees were randomly assigned to a high-stress or low-stress condition, filled out questionnaires that measured Type A behavior and the tendency to explain the environment causally. The results supported the predictions derived from Glass’ model. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0191-8869 1873-3549 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.018 |