Psychopathic traits and experimentally induced deception in self-report assessment

This research examined whether psychopathic traits enabled experimentally induced faking on a self-report inventory. After completing Levenson’s Self-Report Psychopathy scale ( Levenson, Kiehl, & Fitzpatrick, 1995) under standard instructions, 201 undergraduates were randomly assigned to fake go...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality and individual differences 2006-09, Vol.41 (4), p.601-608
Hauptverfasser: Book, Angela S., Holden, Ronald R., Starzyk, Katherine B., Wasylkiw, Louise, Edwards, Melanie J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This research examined whether psychopathic traits enabled experimentally induced faking on a self-report inventory. After completing Levenson’s Self-Report Psychopathy scale ( Levenson, Kiehl, & Fitzpatrick, 1995) under standard instructions, 201 undergraduates were randomly assigned to fake good or fake bad on the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory (HPSI; Holden, 1996). Given the manipulative nature of psychopathy, it was predicted, and found, that respondents who successfully faked good on the HPSI would have significantly higher psychopathy scores than individuals who were caught faking. Also as predicted, individuals who avoided detection while faking bad did not have significantly higher psychopathy scores.
ISSN:0191-8869
1873-3549
DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.011