Taxing family size and subsidizing child-specific commodities?
The effects and optimal choice of policy instruments directly affecting the welfare of parents and children are examined within the context of a household economics model. If fertility were exogenous, and households differed in number of children only, a first best could be implement through a grant...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of public economics 2002-04, Vol.84 (1), p.75-90 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The effects and optimal choice of policy instruments directly affecting the welfare of parents and children are examined within the context of a household economics model. If fertility were exogenous, and households differed in number of children only, a first best could be implement through a grant conditional on family size. Outside this very special case, public intervention is either not justifiable on distributional grounds, or involves taxing child-specific commodities less than adult-specific commodities. If fertility is endogenous, family size must be taxed or subsidized according to whether household expenditure on children is decreasing or increasing in the mother’s wage rate. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0047-2727 1879-2316 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00119-0 |