House price recovery and stigma after a failed siting
The costs of siting a locally undesirable facility include those borne by developers, local government, and those homeowners whose houses decline in value. When a siting fails, developer and government costs are still incurred, in addition to the costs of community opposition. However, the impact of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied economics 1996-11, Vol.28 (11), p.1351-1358 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The costs of siting a locally undesirable facility include those borne by developers, local government, and those homeowners whose houses decline in value. When a siting fails, developer and government costs are still incurred, in addition to the costs of community opposition. However, the impact of a failed siting on residential real estate prices has not been assessed. In this study, house prices in a market surrounding a failed incinerator are examined. While proposing an incinerator did negatively impact house values, prices rebounded after the facility was cancelled. Residents did not attach any stigma to the site. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-6846 1466-4283 |
DOI: | 10.1080/000368496327615 |