Sunk costs, entry, and the timing of cost-reducing investment
The traditional IO literature asserts that firms with monopoly power produce less efficiently than competitive firms and that they often reduce costs only after entry delivers a `wake-up call'. A model with sunk costs and uncertainty can explain this phenomenon. If becoming more efficient entai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of industrial organization 2000-10, Vol.18 (7), p.1067-1084 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The traditional IO literature asserts that firms with monopoly power produce less efficiently than competitive firms and that they often reduce costs only after entry delivers a `wake-up call'. A model with sunk costs and uncertainty can explain this phenomenon. If becoming more efficient entails sunk costs, incumbents have an incentive to wait until a competitor's efficiency is revealed by actual entry before deciding whether to make the investment. This `uncertainty resolution' incentive can outweigh incumbents' incentives to attempt entry preemption. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-7187 1873-7986 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00050-2 |