A refined architecture for terminological systems: Terminology = Schema + Views

Traditionally, the core of a Terminological Knowledge Representation System (TKRS) consists of a TBox or terminology, where concepts are introduced, and an ABox or world description, where facts about individuals are stated in terms of concept memberships. This design has a drawback because in most...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Artificial intelligence 1998-03, Vol.99 (2), p.209-260
Hauptverfasser: Buchheit, M., Donini, F.M., Nutt, W., Schaerf, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Traditionally, the core of a Terminological Knowledge Representation System (TKRS) consists of a TBox or terminology, where concepts are introduced, and an ABox or world description, where facts about individuals are stated in terms of concept memberships. This design has a drawback because in most applications the TBox has to meet two functions at a time: On the one hand—similarly to a database schema—frame-like structures with type information are introduced through primitive concepts and primitive roles; on the other hand, views on the objects in the knowledge base are provided through defined concepts. We propose to account for this conceptual separation by partitioning the TBox into two components for primitive and defined concepts, which we call the schema and the view part. We envision the two parts to differ with respect to the language for concepts, the statements allowed, and the semantics. We argue that this separation achieves more conceptual clarity about the role of primitive and defined concepts and the semantics of terminological cycles. Two case studies show the computational benefits to be gained from the refined architecture.
ISSN:0004-3702
1872-7921
DOI:10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00079-9