U.S. Food Quality Standards: Fix for Market Failure or Costly Anachronism?
Gardner discusses the longstanding attempts to combat non-lethal mischief by food purveyors. The fact that no regulatory impact analyses have attempted to quantify consumer benefits other than safety/health benefits suggests that those other benefits may be small. The likelihood of net benefits appe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of agricultural economics 2003-08, Vol.85 (3), p.725-730 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Gardner discusses the longstanding attempts to combat non-lethal mischief by food purveyors. The fact that no regulatory impact analyses have attempted to quantify consumer benefits other than safety/health benefits suggests that those other benefits may be small. The likelihood of net benefits appears to have been greater in earlier decades, when the adulteration of foods was a more serious problem and private sources of information through the branding of products and sellers, food-related publications, and private evaluation services were less prevalent. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9092 1467-8276 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1467-8276.00475 |