U.S. Food Quality Standards: Fix for Market Failure or Costly Anachronism?

Gardner discusses the longstanding attempts to combat non-lethal mischief by food purveyors. The fact that no regulatory impact analyses have attempted to quantify consumer benefits other than safety/health benefits suggests that those other benefits may be small. The likelihood of net benefits appe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of agricultural economics 2003-08, Vol.85 (3), p.725-730
1. Verfasser: Gardner, Bruce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Gardner discusses the longstanding attempts to combat non-lethal mischief by food purveyors. The fact that no regulatory impact analyses have attempted to quantify consumer benefits other than safety/health benefits suggests that those other benefits may be small. The likelihood of net benefits appears to have been greater in earlier decades, when the adulteration of foods was a more serious problem and private sources of information through the branding of products and sellers, food-related publications, and private evaluation services were less prevalent.
ISSN:0002-9092
1467-8276
DOI:10.1111/1467-8276.00475