Balancing Efficiency in Planning with Justice, Power and Culture

Balancing Efficiency in Planning with Justice, Power and Culture

Chris Webster uses the new institutionalist approach to make some interesting observations about the distribution of rights between government and the market, between central and local agencies and between codified and discretionary forms of regulation. In his short essay Property Rights, Planning a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Town planning review 2005, Vol.76 (4), p.488-492
1. Verfasser: Pearce, Barry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Comments and Discussion
Cost efficiency
Culture
Decision making
Design
Design efficiency
Economic efficiency
Economists
Efficiency
Land development
Landowners
Literary criticism
Market planning
Planning
Planning methods
Power efficiency
Property rights
Public policy
Public sector
Resource ownership
Transaction costs
United Kingdom
Urban development
Urban economics
Urban planning
Webster, Chris
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Chris Webster uses the new institutionalist approach to make some interesting observations about the distribution of rights between government and the market, between central and local agencies and between codified and discretionary forms of regulation. In his short essay Property Rights, Planning and Markets, he provides a classification and analysis of the different kinds of plan. Pearce comments on Webster's essay and his idea of the balance between the various spatial scales of planning.
ISSN:0041-0020
1478-341X