Systemic risk, IT artifacts, and high reliability organizations: a case of constructing a radical architecture

In distributed complex socio-technical systems, risks increasingly originate from multiple sources, affect multiple agents with divergent perspectives and thus become systemic. The traditional simple causal model of risk control and an individual decision-maker orientation is no longer adequate to c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sprouts (Cleveland, Ohio) Ohio), 2004-01, Vol.4
Hauptverfasser: Carlo, Jessica Luo, Lyytinen, Kalle, Boland, Jr., Richard J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In distributed complex socio-technical systems, risks increasingly originate from multiple sources, affect multiple agents with divergent perspectives and thus become systemic. The traditional simple causal model of risk control and an individual decision-maker orientation is no longer adequate to contain such risks. This paper reports a detailed case study of a highly complex architectural project by Frank Gehry and his firm Gehry Partners, L.L.C.. Gehry and his partners used the 3D representation software Catia tactfully in order to construct radical architectures with dauntingly complex geometric surfaces in spite of increasing systemic risks. Our findings suggest that, in order to successfully combat such risks, organizations rely upon organizing mechanisms characteristic of high reliability organizations (HROs). Our analysis also indicates that creating and maintaining a collective mindfulness is critical for risk control/mitigation in complex socio-technical systems. IT artifacts such as Catia, in combination with other social/technical actors such as skilled workers, contracts and communication protocols, can enable the five cognitive processes underlying collective mindfulness: preoccupation with failure, reluctance to simplify interpretations (multiple perspectives), sensitivity to operations (seeing the big picture of operation in the moment), commitment to resilience (ability to bounce back from errors and cope with surprises via improvisation), and underspecfication of structures (organized anarchy via fluid decision-making). Reprinted by permission of the publisher. For a complete copyrights and fair use statement, vist the journal at http://weatherhead.cwru.edu/sprouts or contact the publisher
ISSN:1535-6078
1535-6078