Social Value of Public Information: Comment: Morris and Shin (2002) Is Actually Pro-Transparency, Not Con

The main result of Stephen Morris and Hyun Song Shin (2002) has been presented and interpreted as an anti-transparency result: more public information can be bad for social welfare. Some scrutiny of the result, however, shows that it is actually pro-transparency: except in very special circumstances...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American economic review 2006-03, Vol.96 (1), p.448-452
1. Verfasser: Svensson, Lars E. O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The main result of Stephen Morris and Hyun Song Shin (2002) has been presented and interpreted as an anti-transparency result: more public information can be bad for social welfare. Some scrutiny of the result, however, shows that it is actually pro-transparency: except in very special circumstances, more public information is good. Furthermore, for a conservative benchmark of equal precision in public and private information, social welfare is higher than in a situation without public information.
ISSN:0002-8282
1944-7981
DOI:10.1257/000282806776157650