Social Value of Public Information: Comment: Morris and Shin (2002) Is Actually Pro-Transparency, Not Con
The main result of Stephen Morris and Hyun Song Shin (2002) has been presented and interpreted as an anti-transparency result: more public information can be bad for social welfare. Some scrutiny of the result, however, shows that it is actually pro-transparency: except in very special circumstances...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American economic review 2006-03, Vol.96 (1), p.448-452 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The main result of Stephen Morris and Hyun Song Shin (2002) has been presented and interpreted as an anti-transparency result: more public information can be bad for social welfare. Some scrutiny of the result, however, shows that it is actually pro-transparency: except in very special circumstances, more public information is good. Furthermore, for a conservative benchmark of equal precision in public and private information, social welfare is higher than in a situation without public information. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |
DOI: | 10.1257/000282806776157650 |