Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages

The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a las...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of labor economics 2006-04, Vol.24 (2), p.299-318
1. Verfasser: Loury, Linda Datcher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 2
container_start_page 299
container_title Journal of labor economics
container_volume 24
creator Loury, Linda Datcher
description The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a last resort. Such workers remain at their current jobs mainly because they have few alternative choices rather than because of better match quality. This article shows that the two different explanations are simultaneously valid for different types of contacts and can account for differences in the wage effects of job contacts.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/499974
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37713380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/499974</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/499974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ba5eb4d9edfae007ced90986d285f87bc7b1d767978845e2c27018cb8737c6c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-Ah-CDz6tmjZp_vg2xqaT6UAn-lbS9NZtts2WpIjf3spEwfNwD1x-HA4HodOYXMZE8iumlBJsD_XilIoopUTsox4RlEWU8NdDdOT9mnQSjPfQ45OtAY9sE7QJHg8d4HvbnfG21RUOS93geViC89d42pTW1d33AcKHde9-gO9sjhfQtA4GWDcFftFv4I_RQakrDyc_3kfPk_FidBvN5jfT0XAWGcpZiHKdQs4KBUWpoWtjoFBESV4kMi2lyI3I40JwoYSULIXEJILE0uRSUGG4obSPLna5G2e3LfiQ1StvoKp0A7b1GRUiplSSDjz_B65t65quW5YQxqlUnP2lGWe9d1BmG7eqtfvMYpJ975rtdu3Asx249sG6X4rylKZE0S99vXFO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204638964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Loury, Linda Datcher</creator><creatorcontrib>Loury, Linda Datcher</creatorcontrib><description>The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a last resort. Such workers remain at their current jobs mainly because they have few alternative choices rather than because of better match quality. This article shows that the two different explanations are simultaneously valid for different types of contacts and can account for differences in the wage effects of job contacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-306X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5307</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/499974</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Business networking ; Contracts ; Cousins ; Economics ; Employers ; Employment ; Estimation methods ; Family ; Hispanics ; Hypotheses ; Information sources ; Job search ; Job tenure ; Labor economics ; Labour market ; Labour relations ; Men ; Networks ; Occupational mobility ; Social networks ; Studies ; Tenure ; Unemployment ; Variable coefficients ; Wages ; Wages &amp; salaries ; Workers ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Journal of labor economics, 2006-04, Vol.24 (2), p.299-318</ispartof><rights>2006 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ba5eb4d9edfae007ced90986d285f87bc7b1d767978845e2c27018cb8737c6c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ba5eb4d9edfae007ced90986d285f87bc7b1d767978845e2c27018cb8737c6c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loury, Linda Datcher</creatorcontrib><title>Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages</title><title>Journal of labor economics</title><description>The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a last resort. Such workers remain at their current jobs mainly because they have few alternative choices rather than because of better match quality. This article shows that the two different explanations are simultaneously valid for different types of contacts and can account for differences in the wage effects of job contacts.</description><subject>Business networking</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Cousins</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Hispanics</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Job search</subject><subject>Job tenure</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>Labour relations</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Occupational mobility</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Variable coefficients</subject><subject>Wages</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>0734-306X</issn><issn>1537-5307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-Ah-CDz6tmjZp_vg2xqaT6UAn-lbS9NZtts2WpIjf3spEwfNwD1x-HA4HodOYXMZE8iumlBJsD_XilIoopUTsox4RlEWU8NdDdOT9mnQSjPfQ45OtAY9sE7QJHg8d4HvbnfG21RUOS93geViC89d42pTW1d33AcKHde9-gO9sjhfQtA4GWDcFftFv4I_RQakrDyc_3kfPk_FidBvN5jfT0XAWGcpZiHKdQs4KBUWpoWtjoFBESV4kMi2lyI3I40JwoYSULIXEJILE0uRSUGG4obSPLna5G2e3LfiQ1StvoKp0A7b1GRUiplSSDjz_B65t65quW5YQxqlUnP2lGWe9d1BmG7eqtfvMYpJ975rtdu3Asx249sG6X4rylKZE0S99vXFO</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Loury, Linda Datcher</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages</title><author>Loury, Linda Datcher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ba5eb4d9edfae007ced90986d285f87bc7b1d767978845e2c27018cb8737c6c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Business networking</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Cousins</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Hispanics</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Job search</topic><topic>Job tenure</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>Labour relations</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Occupational mobility</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Variable coefficients</topic><topic>Wages</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loury, Linda Datcher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of labor economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loury, Linda Datcher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages</atitle><jtitle>Journal of labor economics</jtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>299-318</pages><issn>0734-306X</issn><eissn>1537-5307</eissn><abstract>The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a last resort. Such workers remain at their current jobs mainly because they have few alternative choices rather than because of better match quality. This article shows that the two different explanations are simultaneously valid for different types of contacts and can account for differences in the wage effects of job contacts.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/499974</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0734-306X
ispartof Journal of labor economics, 2006-04, Vol.24 (2), p.299-318
issn 0734-306X
1537-5307
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37713380
source Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Business networking
Contracts
Cousins
Economics
Employers
Employment
Estimation methods
Family
Hispanics
Hypotheses
Information sources
Job search
Job tenure
Labor economics
Labour market
Labour relations
Men
Networks
Occupational mobility
Social networks
Studies
Tenure
Unemployment
Variable coefficients
Wages
Wages & salaries
Workers
Working women
title Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A53%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20Contacts%20Are%20More%20Equal%20than%20Others:%20Informal%20Networks,%20Job%20Tenure,%20and%20Wages&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20labor%20economics&rft.au=Loury,%20Linda%C2%A0Datcher&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=299-318&rft.issn=0734-306X&rft.eissn=1537-5307&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/499974&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/499974%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204638964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/499974&rfr_iscdi=true