Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages
The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a las...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of labor economics 2006-04, Vol.24 (2), p.299-318 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 318 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 299 |
container_title | Journal of labor economics |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Loury, Linda Datcher |
description | The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a last resort. Such workers remain at their current jobs mainly because they have few alternative choices rather than because of better match quality. This article shows that the two different explanations are simultaneously valid for different types of contacts and can account for differences in the wage effects of job contacts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/499974 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37713380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/499974</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/499974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ba5eb4d9edfae007ced90986d285f87bc7b1d767978845e2c27018cb8737c6c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-Ah-CDz6tmjZp_vg2xqaT6UAn-lbS9NZtts2WpIjf3spEwfNwD1x-HA4HodOYXMZE8iumlBJsD_XilIoopUTsox4RlEWU8NdDdOT9mnQSjPfQ45OtAY9sE7QJHg8d4HvbnfG21RUOS93geViC89d42pTW1d33AcKHde9-gO9sjhfQtA4GWDcFftFv4I_RQakrDyc_3kfPk_FidBvN5jfT0XAWGcpZiHKdQs4KBUWpoWtjoFBESV4kMi2lyI3I40JwoYSULIXEJILE0uRSUGG4obSPLna5G2e3LfiQ1StvoKp0A7b1GRUiplSSDjz_B65t65quW5YQxqlUnP2lGWe9d1BmG7eqtfvMYpJ975rtdu3Asx249sG6X4rylKZE0S99vXFO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204638964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Loury, Linda Datcher</creator><creatorcontrib>Loury, Linda Datcher</creatorcontrib><description>The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a last resort. Such workers remain at their current jobs mainly because they have few alternative choices rather than because of better match quality. This article shows that the two different explanations are simultaneously valid for different types of contacts and can account for differences in the wage effects of job contacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-306X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5307</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/499974</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Business networking ; Contracts ; Cousins ; Economics ; Employers ; Employment ; Estimation methods ; Family ; Hispanics ; Hypotheses ; Information sources ; Job search ; Job tenure ; Labor economics ; Labour market ; Labour relations ; Men ; Networks ; Occupational mobility ; Social networks ; Studies ; Tenure ; Unemployment ; Variable coefficients ; Wages ; Wages & salaries ; Workers ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Journal of labor economics, 2006-04, Vol.24 (2), p.299-318</ispartof><rights>2006 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ba5eb4d9edfae007ced90986d285f87bc7b1d767978845e2c27018cb8737c6c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ba5eb4d9edfae007ced90986d285f87bc7b1d767978845e2c27018cb8737c6c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loury, Linda Datcher</creatorcontrib><title>Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages</title><title>Journal of labor economics</title><description>The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a last resort. Such workers remain at their current jobs mainly because they have few alternative choices rather than because of better match quality. This article shows that the two different explanations are simultaneously valid for different types of contacts and can account for differences in the wage effects of job contacts.</description><subject>Business networking</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Cousins</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Hispanics</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Job search</subject><subject>Job tenure</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>Labour relations</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Occupational mobility</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Variable coefficients</subject><subject>Wages</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>0734-306X</issn><issn>1537-5307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-Ah-CDz6tmjZp_vg2xqaT6UAn-lbS9NZtts2WpIjf3spEwfNwD1x-HA4HodOYXMZE8iumlBJsD_XilIoopUTsox4RlEWU8NdDdOT9mnQSjPfQ45OtAY9sE7QJHg8d4HvbnfG21RUOS93geViC89d42pTW1d33AcKHde9-gO9sjhfQtA4GWDcFftFv4I_RQakrDyc_3kfPk_FidBvN5jfT0XAWGcpZiHKdQs4KBUWpoWtjoFBESV4kMi2lyI3I40JwoYSULIXEJILE0uRSUGG4obSPLna5G2e3LfiQ1StvoKp0A7b1GRUiplSSDjz_B65t65quW5YQxqlUnP2lGWe9d1BmG7eqtfvMYpJ975rtdu3Asx249sG6X4rylKZE0S99vXFO</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Loury, Linda Datcher</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages</title><author>Loury, Linda Datcher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ba5eb4d9edfae007ced90986d285f87bc7b1d767978845e2c27018cb8737c6c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Business networking</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Cousins</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Hispanics</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Job search</topic><topic>Job tenure</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>Labour relations</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Occupational mobility</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Variable coefficients</topic><topic>Wages</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loury, Linda Datcher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of labor economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loury, Linda Datcher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages</atitle><jtitle>Journal of labor economics</jtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>299-318</pages><issn>0734-306X</issn><eissn>1537-5307</eissn><abstract>The explanation typically given for longer tenure among workers who use informal contacts to find jobs is that relatives and friends reduce uncertainty about the quality of the match between worker and employer. An alternative explanation is that workers rely on informal information sources as a last resort. Such workers remain at their current jobs mainly because they have few alternative choices rather than because of better match quality. This article shows that the two different explanations are simultaneously valid for different types of contacts and can account for differences in the wage effects of job contacts.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/499974</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0734-306X |
ispartof | Journal of labor economics, 2006-04, Vol.24 (2), p.299-318 |
issn | 0734-306X 1537-5307 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37713380 |
source | Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Business networking Contracts Cousins Economics Employers Employment Estimation methods Family Hispanics Hypotheses Information sources Job search Job tenure Labor economics Labour market Labour relations Men Networks Occupational mobility Social networks Studies Tenure Unemployment Variable coefficients Wages Wages & salaries Workers Working women |
title | Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A53%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20Contacts%20Are%20More%20Equal%20than%20Others:%20Informal%20Networks,%20Job%20Tenure,%20and%20Wages&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20labor%20economics&rft.au=Loury,%20Linda%C2%A0Datcher&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=299-318&rft.issn=0734-306X&rft.eissn=1537-5307&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/499974&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/499974%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204638964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/499974&rfr_iscdi=true |