Comment on Laura Kalman's Article

A controversy about how to interpret America's constitutional history of the 1930s has heated up. Dwelling on the emergence of that dispute, though, may inadvertently leave the impression that only in recent years has there been a challenge to what is now characterized as the orthodox view. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American historical review 2005-10, Vol.110 (4), p.1081-1093
1. Verfasser: Leuchtenburg, William E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A controversy about how to interpret America's constitutional history of the 1930s has heated up. Dwelling on the emergence of that dispute, though, may inadvertently leave the impression that only in recent years has there been a challenge to what is now characterized as the orthodox view. In fact, there has never been a time when there has not been an alternative perception.
ISSN:0002-8762
1937-5239
DOI:10.1086/ahr.110.4.1081