The Feldstein–Horioka hypothesis versus the long-run solvency constraint model: A critical assessment
This paper proposes an extended version of the long-run solvency constraint model developed by Coakley et al. [Coakley, J., Kulasi, F., Smith, R., 1996. Current Account Solvency and the Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle, Economic Journal 106, 620–627.] that provides a theoretical, and empirically testable, d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economics letters 2008, Vol.98 (1), p.66-70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper proposes an extended version of the long-run solvency constraint model developed by Coakley et al. [Coakley, J., Kulasi, F., Smith, R., 1996. Current Account Solvency and the Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle, Economic Journal 106, 620–627.] that provides a theoretical, and empirically testable, distinction from the Feldstein–Horioka hypothesis. The empirical application shows that the Feldstein–Horioka approach presents a useful, but incomplete, measure of capital mobility in 6 OECD countries. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-1765 1873-7374 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.04.007 |