The Feldstein–Horioka hypothesis versus the long-run solvency constraint model: A critical assessment

This paper proposes an extended version of the long-run solvency constraint model developed by Coakley et al. [Coakley, J., Kulasi, F., Smith, R., 1996. Current Account Solvency and the Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle, Economic Journal 106, 620–627.] that provides a theoretical, and empirically testable, d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economics letters 2008, Vol.98 (1), p.66-70
Hauptverfasser: Nell, Kevin S., Santos, Luis Delfim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper proposes an extended version of the long-run solvency constraint model developed by Coakley et al. [Coakley, J., Kulasi, F., Smith, R., 1996. Current Account Solvency and the Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle, Economic Journal 106, 620–627.] that provides a theoretical, and empirically testable, distinction from the Feldstein–Horioka hypothesis. The empirical application shows that the Feldstein–Horioka approach presents a useful, but incomplete, measure of capital mobility in 6 OECD countries.
ISSN:0165-1765
1873-7374
DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.04.007