Solvency vs competition: Hobson's choice for the Fed

I demonstrate three propositions about U.S. banking. Required reserves do not enhance bank safety; they place an upper bound on some bank deposits including loans. Useful bank reserves are its unrestricted liquid assets but liquidity cannot be available for all banks simultaneously. Required reserve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of international money and finance 2007-11, Vol.26 (7), p.1151-1173
1. Verfasser: Telser, Lester G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:I demonstrate three propositions about U.S. banking. Required reserves do not enhance bank safety; they place an upper bound on some bank deposits including loans. Useful bank reserves are its unrestricted liquid assets but liquidity cannot be available for all banks simultaneously. Required reserves create pressures forcing all banks to move in tandem and penalize individuals swimming against the tide. Reserve requirements constrained competition among banks until 1992 when major legal changes eliminated them. Federal Funds Rate became a signal reducing competition among banks. Now short-term rates and the Federal Funds Rate move in lock step. This reduces bank competition.
ISSN:0261-5606
1873-0639
DOI:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2007.06.010