Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames
Pluralistic organizations characterized by multiple objectives, diffuse power and knowledge-based work processes present a complex challenge both for strategy theorists and for strategy practitioners because the very nature of strategy as usually understood (an explicit and unified direction for the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human relations (New York) 2007-01, Vol.60 (1), p.179-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Pluralistic organizations characterized by multiple objectives, diffuse power and
knowledge-based work processes present a complex challenge both for strategy
theorists and for strategy practitioners because the very nature of strategy as
usually understood (an explicit and unified direction for the organization) appears
to contradict the natural dynamics of these organizations. Yet pluralism is to some
extent always present in organizations and perhaps increasingly so. This article
explores the usefulness of three alternate and complementary theoretical frames for
understanding and influencing strategy practice in pluralistic contexts:
Actor-Network Theory, Conventionalist Theory and the social practice perspective.
Each of these frameworks has a predominant focus on one of the fundamental attributes
of pluralism: power, values and knowledge. Together, they offer a multi-faceted
understanding of the complex practice of strategizing in pluralistic contexts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-7267 1741-282X |
DOI: | 10.1177/0018726707075288 |