TWISTING ARMS OR A HELPING HAND? Assessing the Impact of 'Coerced' and Comparable 'Voluntary' Drug Treatment Options

Despite the rapid expansion of options to coerce drug-dependent offenders into treatment—culminating recently in the provisions of the 2005 Drugs Act and the government's 'Tough Choices' agenda—research findings to date are equivocal about their impact in reducing crime. This paper pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of criminology 2007-05, Vol.47 (3), p.470-490
Hauptverfasser: McSweeney, Tim, Stevens, Alex, Hunt, Neil, Turnbull, Paul J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite the rapid expansion of options to coerce drug-dependent offenders into treatment—culminating recently in the provisions of the 2005 Drugs Act and the government's 'Tough Choices' agenda—research findings to date are equivocal about their impact in reducing crime. This paper presents UK findings from a pan-European study on this issue. The results—at both national and international levels—reveal that court-mandated clients reported significant and sustained reductions in illicit drug use and offending behaviours, and improvements in other areas of social functioning. Those entering the same treatment services through non-criminal justice routes also reported similar reductions and improvements. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of recent policy developments.
ISSN:0007-0955
1464-3529
DOI:10.1093/bjc/azl087