Hrdlička’s Aleutian Population‐Replacement Hypothesis: A Radiometric Evaluation

In a 1945 monograph, Hrdlika argued that, at 1,000 BP, PaleoAleut people on Umnak Island were replaced by NeoAleut groups moving west along the island chain. His argument was based on cranial measurements of skeletal remains from Chaluka Midden and mummified remains from Kagamil and Ship Rock burial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current anthropology 2006-06, Vol.47 (3), p.537-548
Hauptverfasser: BrennerColtrain, Joan, Hayes, M.Geoffrey, ORourke, DennisH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a 1945 monograph, Hrdlika argued that, at 1,000 BP, PaleoAleut people on Umnak Island were replaced by NeoAleut groups moving west along the island chain. His argument was based on cranial measurements of skeletal remains from Chaluka Midden and mummified remains from Kagamil and Ship Rock burial caves. By the 1980s, researchers had concluded that the transition demonstrated by Hrdlika, from a high oblong to a lowvaulted wide face, was merely one example of a global trend in cranial morphology and therefore population replacement had not occurred. Calibrated accelerator radiocarbon dates on purified bone collagen from 80 individuals indicate that PaleoAleuts were the oldest population in the Aleutians, with a time depth of ca. 4,000 years, that Paleo and NeoAleuts were fully contemporary on Umnak Island after 1,000 BP, and that the former continued to bury their dead as inhumations long after the introduction of NeoAleut mummification practices. These results as well as features of the Aleut dietary, genetic, and material record suggest that the appearance of NeoAleut people represents an influx of closely related people characterized by greater social complexity and that social disparities that may have existed between Paleo and NeoAleuts were largely subsumed in the social and demographic upheaval following Russian contact.
ISSN:0011-3204
1537-5382
DOI:10.1086/504169