Do CEO Stock Options Prevent or Promote Fraudulent Financial Reporting?

We contrast the conventional view that CEO stock options aid corporate governance by reducing moral hazard with the proposal that CEO stock options may subvert sound corporate governance. Views were tested in 65 matched pairs of public US firm that either had or had not been discovered misreporting...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academy of Management journal 2006-06, Vol.49 (3), p.483-500
Hauptverfasser: O'Connor, Joseph P., Priem, Richard L., Coombs, Joseph E., Gilley, K. Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We contrast the conventional view that CEO stock options aid corporate governance by reducing moral hazard with the proposal that CEO stock options may subvert sound corporate governance. Views were tested in 65 matched pairs of public US firm that either had or had not been discovered misreporting financial results. Out results support both the traditional perspective and out unprincipled agent view: in our sample, large CEO stock option grants were sometimes associated with a lower incidence of fraudulent reporting and sometimes with a greater incidence, depending upon whether CEO duality was present and whether directors also held stock options. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0001-4273
1948-0989
DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794666