Investment banker reputation and two-stage combination carve-outs and spin-offs
This study examines whether investment banker reputation impacts the initial period returns of two stage combinations (carve-outs followed by spin-offs). All prior literature regarding investment banker reputation is based on single-stage events (IPOs). An analysis is conducted of all completed two-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of banking & finance 2006-01, Vol.30 (1), p.85-110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study examines whether investment banker reputation impacts the initial period returns of two stage combinations (carve-outs followed by spin-offs). All prior literature regarding investment banker reputation is based on single-stage events (IPOs). An analysis is conducted of all completed two-stage carve-outs/spin-offs from 1981 to 2002. Findings indicate that underwriters for two-stage combinations retain their reputation in contrast with the single-stage findings of Carter et al. [Carter, R.B., Dark, F.H., Piwowar, M.S., 2002. IPOs and underwriter reputation: Redeeming the value of reputation. Working Paper, Iowa State University] that investment bankers redeemed (cashed-in) their reputation. Also, this study finds that the Carter et al. reputation factors dominate the Loughran and Ritter [Loughran, T., Ritter, J.R., 2002. Why don’t issuers get upset about leaving money on the table in IPOs? The Review of Financial Studies 15 (2), 413–443] reputation factors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-4266 1872-6372 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.12.001 |