Accreditation of on-line dispute resolution practitioners
The incorporation of ODR into the practice of dispute resolution creates the need to address issues of accreditation such as the qualifications of practitioners and standards of practice for resolving disputes on‐line. This article outlines models for accrediting practitioners, including case studie...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Conflict resolution quarterly 2006-03, Vol.23 (3), p.383-404 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 404 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 383 |
| container_title | Conflict resolution quarterly |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Tyler, Melissa Conley Bornstein, Jackie |
| description | The incorporation of ODR into the practice of dispute resolution creates the need to address issues of accreditation such as the qualifications of practitioners and standards of practice for resolving disputes on‐line. This article outlines models for accrediting practitioners, including case studies of accreditation systems introduced by ODR providers, and the impact such models may have on the emerging field of ODR. The article is based on research conducted for the Department of Justice Victoria (Conley Tyler, Bornstein, and Bretherton, 2004). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/crq.145 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36438195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36438195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-6496bb5f2784bbe4d0ae0f7403ee71187708e0ab430ba4cafda245f167813c043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFKxDAQBuAiCq6r-ArFgx6k66RJmva4LLoqZUVRBC8hTaeQtdt2kxbdt7e14kHwNAPz8TP8nndKYEYAwitttzPC-J43IZyRgHCI94edRgHnMTn0jpxbA5AEeDjxkrnWFnPTqtbUlV8Xfl0FpanQz41ruhZ9i64uu-9rY5VuzbCidcfeQaFKhyc_c-q93Fw_L26D9GF5t5ingaZc8CBiSZRlvAhFzLIMWQ4KoRAMKKIgJBYCYgSVMQqZYloVuQoZL0gkYkI1MDr1zsfcxtbbDl0rN8ZpLEtVYd05SSNGY5LwHp79geu6s1X_mwyBAyEJHdIuRqRt7ZzFQjbWbJTdSQJy6E_2_cm-v15ejvLDlLj7j8nF0-Oog1Eb1-Lnr1b2XUaCCi5fV0sp0nAl3lIq7-kXHnZ-4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205011934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accreditation of on-line dispute resolution practitioners</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Tyler, Melissa Conley ; Bornstein, Jackie</creator><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Melissa Conley ; Bornstein, Jackie</creatorcontrib><description>The incorporation of ODR into the practice of dispute resolution creates the need to address issues of accreditation such as the qualifications of practitioners and standards of practice for resolving disputes on‐line. This article outlines models for accrediting practitioners, including case studies of accreditation systems introduced by ODR providers, and the impact such models may have on the emerging field of ODR. The article is based on research conducted for the Department of Justice Victoria (Conley Tyler, Bornstein, and Bretherton, 2004).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-5581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-1508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/crq.145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Bargaining ; Case studies ; Communications technology ; Community ; Conflict resolution ; Cultural studies ; Decision making ; Empirical research ; Ethics ; Government agencies ; Impact analysis ; Information ; Internet ; Jurisdiction ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Conflict resolution quarterly, 2006-03, Vol.23 (3), p.383-404</ispartof><rights>Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the Association for Conflict Resolution</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Spring 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-6496bb5f2784bbe4d0ae0f7403ee71187708e0ab430ba4cafda245f167813c043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-6496bb5f2784bbe4d0ae0f7403ee71187708e0ab430ba4cafda245f167813c043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcrq.145$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcrq.145$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27847,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Melissa Conley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Jackie</creatorcontrib><title>Accreditation of on-line dispute resolution practitioners</title><title>Conflict resolution quarterly</title><addtitle>Conflict Resolution Quarterly</addtitle><description>The incorporation of ODR into the practice of dispute resolution creates the need to address issues of accreditation such as the qualifications of practitioners and standards of practice for resolving disputes on‐line. This article outlines models for accrediting practitioners, including case studies of accreditation systems introduced by ODR providers, and the impact such models may have on the emerging field of ODR. The article is based on research conducted for the Department of Justice Victoria (Conley Tyler, Bornstein, and Bretherton, 2004).</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Cultural studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1536-5581</issn><issn>1541-1508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFKxDAQBuAiCq6r-ArFgx6k66RJmva4LLoqZUVRBC8hTaeQtdt2kxbdt7e14kHwNAPz8TP8nndKYEYAwitttzPC-J43IZyRgHCI94edRgHnMTn0jpxbA5AEeDjxkrnWFnPTqtbUlV8Xfl0FpanQz41ruhZ9i64uu-9rY5VuzbCidcfeQaFKhyc_c-q93Fw_L26D9GF5t5ingaZc8CBiSZRlvAhFzLIMWQ4KoRAMKKIgJBYCYgSVMQqZYloVuQoZL0gkYkI1MDr1zsfcxtbbDl0rN8ZpLEtVYd05SSNGY5LwHp79geu6s1X_mwyBAyEJHdIuRqRt7ZzFQjbWbJTdSQJy6E_2_cm-v15ejvLDlLj7j8nF0-Oog1Eb1-Lnr1b2XUaCCi5fV0sp0nAl3lIq7-kXHnZ-4g</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Tyler, Melissa Conley</creator><creator>Bornstein, Jackie</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Accreditation of on-line dispute resolution practitioners</title><author>Tyler, Melissa Conley ; Bornstein, Jackie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-6496bb5f2784bbe4d0ae0f7403ee71187708e0ab430ba4cafda245f167813c043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Cultural studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Melissa Conley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Jackie</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Conflict resolution quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tyler, Melissa Conley</au><au>Bornstein, Jackie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accreditation of on-line dispute resolution practitioners</atitle><jtitle>Conflict resolution quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Conflict Resolution Quarterly</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>383-404</pages><issn>1536-5581</issn><eissn>1541-1508</eissn><abstract>The incorporation of ODR into the practice of dispute resolution creates the need to address issues of accreditation such as the qualifications of practitioners and standards of practice for resolving disputes on‐line. This article outlines models for accrediting practitioners, including case studies of accreditation systems introduced by ODR providers, and the impact such models may have on the emerging field of ODR. The article is based on research conducted for the Department of Justice Victoria (Conley Tyler, Bornstein, and Bretherton, 2004).</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/crq.145</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1536-5581 |
| ispartof | Conflict resolution quarterly, 2006-03, Vol.23 (3), p.383-404 |
| issn | 1536-5581 1541-1508 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36438195 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Accreditation Bargaining Case studies Communications technology Community Conflict resolution Cultural studies Decision making Empirical research Ethics Government agencies Impact analysis Information Internet Jurisdiction Studies |
| title | Accreditation of on-line dispute resolution practitioners |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T01%3A59%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accreditation%20of%20on-line%20dispute%20resolution%20practitioners&rft.jtitle=Conflict%20resolution%20quarterly&rft.au=Tyler,%20Melissa%20Conley&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=383-404&rft.issn=1536-5581&rft.eissn=1541-1508&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/crq.145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36438195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205011934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |