Stable isotope analysis of the Cretaceous sulfur cycle

We report the sulfur and oxygen isotope composition of sulfate (δ 34S SO4 and δ 18O SO4, respectively) in coexisting barite and carbonate-associated sulfate (CAS), which we use to explore temporal variability in the marine sulfur cycle through the middle Cretaceous. The δ 34S SO4 of marine barite tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth and planetary science letters 2009-07, Vol.285 (1), p.115-123
Hauptverfasser: Turchyn, Alexandra V., Schrag, Daniel P., Coccioni, Rodolfo, Montanari, Alessandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We report the sulfur and oxygen isotope composition of sulfate (δ 34S SO4 and δ 18O SO4, respectively) in coexisting barite and carbonate-associated sulfate (CAS), which we use to explore temporal variability in the marine sulfur cycle through the middle Cretaceous. The δ 34S SO4 of marine barite tracks previously reported sulfur isotope data from the tropical Pacific. The δ 18O SO4 of marine barite exhibits more rapid and larger isotopic excursions than the δ 34S SO4 of marine barite; these excursions temporally coincide with Ocean Anoxic Events (OAEs). Neither the δ 34S SO4 nor the δ 18O SO4 measured in marine barite resembles the δ 34S SO4 or the δ 18O SO4 measured in coexisting CAS. Culling our data set for elemental parameters suggestive of carbonate recrystallization (low [Sr] and high Mn/Sr) improves our record of δ 18O SO4 in CAS in the Cretaceous. This suggests that the CAS proxy can be impacted by carbonate recrystallization in some marine sediments. A box model is used to explore the response of the δ 34S SO4 and δ 18O SO4 to different perturbations in the marine biogeochemical sulfur cycle. We conclude that the δ 34S SO4 in the middle Cretaceous is likely responding to a change in the isotopic composition of pyrite being buried, coupled possibly with a change in riverine input. On the other hand, the δ 18O SO4 is likely responding to rapid changes in the reoxidation pathway of sulfide, which we suggest may be due to anoxic versus euxinic conditions during different OAEs.
ISSN:0012-821X
1385-013X
DOI:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.06.002