Structure comparison of co-crystallized 6- and 12-sided large cancrinite crystals

Single crystals of hexagonal and dihexagonal morphology cancrinites, crystallized in the same batch reaction with sodalite, have been characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis. Although the unit cell values are almost identical, Si–O bond lengths are greater for the di-hexagonal form (1.650 Å vs....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microporous and mesoporous materials 2009-07, Vol.123 (1), p.274-279
Hauptverfasser: Vaughan, David E.W., Yennawar, Hemant P., Perrotta, Anthony J., Benesi, Alan J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Single crystals of hexagonal and dihexagonal morphology cancrinites, crystallized in the same batch reaction with sodalite, have been characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis. Although the unit cell values are almost identical, Si–O bond lengths are greater for the di-hexagonal form (1.650 Å vs. 1.624 Å) and the Al–O bond lengths are shorter (1.710 Å vs. 1.724 Å), possibly indicating greater T-site Si–Al disorder in the di-hexagonal form. 27Al–MASNMR also indicates that the hexagonal form contains minor occluded Al ( OH ) 4 - ions (as does the co-crystallized sodalite). In addition to forming homogeneous single crystals, the di-hexagonal form frequently occurs as an overgrowth on hexagonal crystals, indicating that it results from a secondary crystallization, possibly coincident with the dissolution of sodalite coincident with the final phase of fractional crystallization.
ISSN:1387-1811
1873-3093
DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.04.021